PTI said Fernandes challenged his critics who accused him of incurring a huge financial burden by rushing troops to the border, saying: "We have achieved the objectives of the deployment." India's re-deployment, seen widely as the result of sustained international pressure, has been accompanied by verbal sniping with Pakistan and lingering uncertainty about the next steps towards peace between the two countries. "Countries ruled by dictators or a military man may, under international pressure, say sometimes they do not believe in terrorism and are combating it. However, actually they feel that if ISI is used to achieve political objectives, it is not wrong," Indian Deputy Prime Minister Lal Krishan Advani told paramilitary troopers of the Indo-Tibetan border police. "The world should ostracize such nations which support terrorism, so that they realize that not only one country but the whole world is against terror."
In a further twist to the existing standoff, The Hindu newspaper reported yesterday that India had made attendance in the scheduled Saarc summit in Islamabad next year conditional on solid progress being made on regional economic cooperation agreements. Earlier a news channel had claimed terrorism was the real hurdle. "There has to be something concrete to show as far as progress on Sapta and Safta are concerned," the newspaper quoted an Indian source as saying, adding that crucial meetings at the official level are to take place next week in Kathmandu. The Indian Commerce Secretary, Dipak Chatterjee, would travel to Nepal for a meeting of the Saarc Committee on Economic Cooperation, The Hindu said. Indian officials acknowledged that a formal letter was received last month from Pakistan through the Saarc Secretariat in Kathmandu proposing January 11-13 as dates for the summit.
After India makes an assessment of the progress at the Kathmandu meetings, a decision would be taken whether or not the Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee will travel to Islamabad for the Saarc summit. "The sources maintained that India was likely to decide next month whether or not the dates were suitable for the Prime Minister to visit Pakistan," The Hindu said. The uncertainty has drawn a sharp rebuke from Pakistan, which accuses New Delhi of creating confusion about the holding of the summit.
The Hindu quoted its sources as expressing fears about the possibility of high-intensity "terrorist strikes" in the run-up to the Saarc summit or even during the course of the meeting. "Such a concern, clearly, is a real one given the fact that Pakistan-based terrorist groups have been targeting innocent civilians both within and outside Jammu and Kashmir."
Asked whether some countries had consented to the dates proposed by Pakistan, the sources replied in the affirmative. They also pointed out that no Government been formed in Pakistan as yet and New Delhi was still watching the situation. There is little doubt that given the "high-voltage" media coverage being given to Pakistan, India and the Saarc summit, "this controversy will not die down till New Delhi decides one way or the other," the newspaper said.